For archives, these articles are being stored on TheWE.biz website.
The purpose is to advance understandings of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues.

 
"Hizbullah's real victory resides in its grassroots base.   Just as some envy Lebanese society for its resistance movement, that movement should also be envied for its society.
Specifically, I refer to the society of southern Lebanon, Dahiya and Bakaa:
That unique historical, cultural, political, literary, aesthetic blend of tobacco farmers and resistance fighters.
Neighbours to Palestine and Syria.
On the dividing line between the acceptance and rejection of the Sykes-Picot agreement.
Mountain dwellers and coastal peoples from northern Galilee and southern Lebanon.
Theologians of the underprivileged and oppressed.
Advocates of ethnic-free Arabism and Lebanese authenticity.
Believers in communism, nationalism, pan-Arab nationalism, religious devotion and denominational pluralism.
All within a small stretch of land each patch of which has its own name, its own story to tell and its own sense of identity.
Once the ceasefire went into effect the people of the south did not wait a single moment more than they had to in the public gardens and schools of Beirut.
As soon as they could they headed back to their towns and villages to shoo away the Israeli army.
That's the people of Lebanon for you: tougher than rock and gentler than a mother cradling her child.
They are the people making the great march southward, even before the bridges are rebuilt and the roads repaired, because they are the country's roads and bridges."
Azmi Bishara     http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/

Middle East
Sep 9, 2006      
How hi-tech Hezbollah called the shots
By Iason Athanasiadis
BEIRUT — Hezbollah's ability to repel the Israel Defense Forces during the recent conflict was largely due to its use of intelligence techniques gleaned from allies Iran and Syria that allowed it to monitor encoded Israeli communications relating to battlefield actions, according to Israeli officials, whose claims have been independently corroborated by the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
"Israeli EW [electronic warfare] systems were unable to jam the systems at the Iranian Embassy in Beirut, they proved unable to jam Hezbollah's command and control links from Lebanon to Iranian facilities in Syria, they blocked the Barak ship anti-missile systems, and they hacked into Israeli operations communications in the field," Richard Sale, the longtime intelligence editor for United Press International, who was alerted to this intelligence ailure by current and former CIA officials, told Asia Times Online.
The ability to hack into Israel's military communications gave Hezbollah a decisive battlefield advantage, aside from allowing it to dominate the media war by repeatedly intercepting reports of the casualties it had inflicted and announcing them through its television station, Al-Manar.   Al-Manar's general director, Abdallah Kassir, would not comment on the information-gathering methods that had allowed it to preempt Israel's casualty announcements, but he admitted he was in constant contact with Hezbollah's military wing.
When Israeli troops invaded southern Lebanon, they found themselves bogged down in stronger-than-expected Hezbollah resistance.   The story of the handful of Hezbollah militants who single-handedly defended the border village of Aita Shaab has already become legend.   Ultimately, Israel decided that the only way to neutralize them was to carpet-bomb the village, reducing it to rubble in the process.
Part of the reason for Hezbollah's decisive battlefield performance was that it was gleaning valuable information by monitoring telephone conversations in Hebrew between Israeli reservists and their families on their personal mobile phones.
"If an enemy sets up a small group of EW people familiar with the terrain and reasonably aware of the current tactical situation, a stream of in-the-clear calls could have been a gold mine of information mentioned inadvertently," said Sale, quoting a CIA official.
A London Sunday Times article titled "Humbling of the super-troops shatters Israeli army morale" reported the story last week.   It stated that Hezbollah was "able to crack the codes and follow the fast-changing frequencies of Israeli radio communications, intercepting reports of the casualties they had inflicted again and again".
The development marks a potential turning point in the region's strategic balance.   Hezbollah's ability to repel Israel's elite troops marked the first time that an Arab force had frustrated a concerted invasion scenario by Israel.   This has led to a concerted rethink on the part of the Israeli leadership, in which it is being assisted by American experts, according to Israeli intelligence website DEBKAfile.
It adds that the American experts are particularly focused on how Iranian EW installed in Lebanese army coastal radar stations blocked the Barak anti-missile missiles aboard Israeli warships, allowing Hezbollah to hit at least one Israeli corvette, the Hanith.
"Assuming that these capabilities came from Syria and Iran, most probably by way of Russia and China, one would have to believe that both the US and Israel have learned from the experience, and that leaning process will be applied in future conflicts," said Robert Freedman, Peggy Meyerhoff Pearlstone professor of political science at the Baltimore Hebrew University.
The Debka article also claims that Hezbollah secretary general Hassan Nasrallah was hosted throughout the war in an underground war-room beneath the Iranian Embassy in Beirut.   Iranian involvement was suspected throughout the conflict, and a captured Hezbollah guerrilla confessed on Israeli television to have visited Iran for training.   The most able and committed Hezbollah guerrillas usually visit Iran for religious indoctrination and training in the firing of non-Katyusha rocketry.
"It [the technological breakthrough] may mean that the US and Israel no longer have the ability to operate at lower levels of violence on a supreme basis," said a Middle East analyst.   "The playing field is more leveled.   This may mean more diplomacy or it may mean more, and more concentrated, violence."
Iran and Syria advanced their SIGINT (SIGnals INTelligence — intelligence-gathering by interception of signals) cooperation last November, as part of a joint strategic defense cooperation accord aimed at consolidating the strategic aspect of their long-term alliance.   Aside from being an invaluable help to Hezbollah, the ability to read Israeli and US codes could aid Iran in monitoring US movements in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"It goes to the heart of one of the factors ... routinely regarded as one of the clear advantages for all First World versus Third World nations or forces — electronic warfare and secure communications," said Gary Sick, who was national security adviser under US president Jimmy Carter.   "We are supposed to be able to read and interfere with their communications, not vice versa.   A lot of calculations are based on that premise."
Iason Athanasiadis is an Iran-based correspondent.

Copyright 2006, Asia Times Online
The small town of Tiri, not far from the better known Bint Jbeil and Maroun Al-Ras, is typical of many towns and villages in southern Lebanon.
It commands a bird's eye view of the surrounding hills and villages.
It was also the scene of one of the fiercer standoffs between Hizbullah fighters and invading Israeli troops.
Not far from the Israeli border, there is little in the way of geography, the massive destruction caused by Israeli bombing, or support for Hizbullah that distinguishes Tiri from great swathes of the south.
Despite the destruction inflicted by 34 days of continuous bombing it is hard to escape the pervasive sense of Hizbullah's military victory in southern Lebanon.
"After what they suffered here, the violence, the psychological torture, there is no way the Israelis will dare reinvade," Ali, a native of the town, told Al-Ahram Weekly.
"The Israelis may have had tanks, planes, helicopters, but they lacked the Hizbullah fighters' self-reliance.
"The minute they sensed danger they would squeak like chicks.
"You saw the images of Israeli soldiers crying on television — you know what I'm talking about.
"They knew they could no longer fight their war on the military front and even hope to win."
Serene Assir from Beirut     http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/
Earth, a planet
hungry for peace

(IPC, 7/4/04)
The Israeli apartheid (land grab) wall
around Palestinian population centers.
US Israel atrocities.

Hassan Shalhoub, 4, is embraced by his mother Rabab at a relative's house in Aley, east of Beirut, August 3, 2006.

Hassan and his mother were injured in Qana during the US supplied and paid for US Israel air raid on July 30, 2006.

Hassan's three-year-old sister was among the children killed during that raid.

More than Fifteen million US dollars is given by US taxpayers each day for the military use of Israel, which presently involves the imprisonment of the remaining segregated ' Bantustan — Apartheid ' parcels of land occupied by millions of Palestinian.

Palestinians were forced from their homes 60 years ago from what is now called Israel into refugee camps in Gaza and the West Bank, Jordan and Lebanon.

While attempts have been made by the Palestinians to create a better life for themselves, these refugee camps have been forced upon them to this day by American Taxpayer funding, and Anglo American, Europe backing and banking for Israel that has propped up the forced 'state' of Israel for more than fifty years.

Illuminati, New World Order elite have been at the forefront in protecting European and American settler people who stole the land and continue to steal the remaining few segments of land from the Palestinians, in essence taking away from the Palestinians piece by piece this land over these many years.

Funding by the US Taxpayer for the enslavement of the Palestinian people continues to increase, estimated now considerably more than the previous 4 billion US dollars per year.

Picture: REUTERS/Jamal Saidi, Lebanon
US Israel atrocities.
Hassan Shalhoub, 4, is embraced by his mother Rabab at a relative's house in Aley, east of Beirut, August 3, 2006.
Hassan and his mother were injured in Qana during the US Israel air raid on July 30, 2006.
Hassan's three-year-old sister was among the children killed during that raid.
Conflict Terminology: A Note For Editors, Journalists, and Readers
The corporate media of the US-UK-Israel alliance describe Iraqis, Afghanis, and Palestinians opposing the invading armies as "terrorists," "insurgents," or "rebels."
However, most media around the world, including alternative media in the US-UK-Israel camp, call them resistance or guerrilla fighters.
The difference in the usage of these conflict terms is important because they are used to justify the actions of each camp.
1.   Politics is the process of who gets what resources, when, and how.
Political activities aim ultimately to controlling wealth in any society.   How the budget is going to be decided and who benefits most is the end outcome of the competition.   In the US, the media obscures the term to refer to differences on other issues.
2.   War is using force to achieve political means.   It is fought by regular military forces from different countries.  
There is no war in Iraq or Afghanistan because there are no Iraqi or Afghani regular armed forces.   There is resistance to foreign occupation in both countries.   The term, "occupation" was mentioned in the UN Security Council resolution, in reference to presence of US forces in Iraq.
3.   Civil War is using force to achieve political means.   It is fought by regular or irregular military forces from the same country.
As long as there are foreign forces in Iran and Afghanistan, there is no civil war.   There are US-backed Iraqis fighting Iraqis resisting the US occupation.
4.   Rebellion is fighting one's own legitimate government in order to achieve political goals.   It involves an open, armed, and organized resistance.
As a result, it's inaccurate to describe Muqtada Al-Sadr, for example, as a rebel, until at least the government can be legitimate and truly sovereign.
5.   Uprising is an unarmed rebellion that is confronted by applying government force against the civilian population.
This term accurately applies to the peaceful activities of the Palestinian people and groups in opposing the Israeli occupation, such as protests, demonstrations, sit-ins, and hunger strikes.   But it does not apply to the armed struggle.
6.   Insurgency is an armed uprising against one's own government but it is less organized than a rebellion.
What's happening in Iraq is not an insurgency because the fighting is between Iraqis and foreign forces or between Iraqis and other Iraqis who are recruited by foreign forces.   A more accurate term is resistance to the foreign occupation of the country.
7.   Guerrilla is one who engages in irregular warfare in connection with a regular war.
In the first stages of the fighting, during 2003, Iraqi armed activities were accurately described by even the US military commanders as a guerrilla warfare.   However, it has taken a more coherent and coordinated shape, particularly in 2004.   Thus, a more accurate term is resistance, if the fighting is aimed at the opposing military forces.
8.   Militants are persons aggressively involved in fighting.
This term should not apply to political leaders or activists, as many journalists do.
9.   Resistance is the act of using arms to oppose the invading armed forces.
This is the term used throughout the 20th century to describe opposing foreign occupation forces, particularly German occupation forces in Europe.   It should apply to groups fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Palestine.
10.   Terrorism is terrorizing or being terrorized, a mode of governing, or of opposing government by intimidation.
The term should be used to describe individuals, groups, and governments, which are involved in terrorizing the civilian populations.   Corporate media journalists use the term routinely to describe individuals and groups but never use to describe the governments which target the civilian population by killing them, destroying their homes and fields, or by subjecting them to collective punishment.   For a balanced approach, both terms of terrorism and state terrorism should be used.
11.   Illegal Settlement Activity refers to the construction of population centers for the invading group on confiscated lands inside the invaded or occupied territories.
This activity is illegal because it violates the international law that prohibits changing the demographic status of the occupied territories.   That is why the Israeli activities in the occupied territories should be accurately referred to as illegal settlement activity.   If the term settlement is used alone, it misleads readers to think positively of the activity.
Ronald D Kennedy of California suggested that Israeli illegal settlers in the occupied Palestinian territories be called squatters.   If his suggestion is followed, then illegal settlements may also be called squatterments.
Hilmi Salem of Canada objected to the term "squatter" because it means one who or that which squates, i.e. to settle on a piece of land without title or payment; especially one who settles on land without permission or right.   This does not apply to the Palestinian territories which are owned by the Palestinian people.   He suggested the use of colony and colonist instead.   But the problem with the term "colony" is that it refers to a whole country, like Egypt or India, which were British colonies.
So far, the most accurate term to describe the Israeli occupation activities in confiscating and annexing Palestinian lands is "illegal Israeli settlement activities."
12. Sunna and Shi'a are the two major Islamic sects or schools of thought.  
The apostrophe before the letter a in Shi'a represent a glottal Arabic sound.
13.   Sunnis and Shi'is are followers of the Sunna and Shi'a schools.
Journalists in the Western media in general use the term Shiite in reference to Shi'i.   This is a derogatory term, particularly in English, that should not be used.   More important is that it is inaccurate and does not comply with the Arabic way of adjectivizing, as in the case with Sunni.
14.   Enemy Combatant: The term, Enemy Combatant, is used by the Bush administration to refer to a person designated by the US President as an enemy fighter, even if he/she is not a member of an army, like Guantanamo prisoners.   The term also applies to US citizens, like Padilla.   The US courts ruled in 2004 that even if a person is classified as such, he/she could have access to federal courts, which means the right to an attorney, due process, and a trial.
Please take note of the conflict terminolgy used in the following article.
And more importantly with the assumption of Israel and Western, US, UK analysis being the de-facto reasoning of truth.

Kewe - TheWE.biz
The Sunday Times - World
August 27, 2006
Humbling of the supertroops shatters Israeli army morale
Uzi Mahnaimi, Tel Aviv
HUNDREDS of feet below ground in the command bunker of the Israeli air force in Tel Aviv, a crowd of officers gathered to monitor the first day of the war against Hezbollah.   It was July 12 and air force jets were about to attack Hezbollah’s military nerve centre in southern Beirut.
Among the officers smoking tensely as they waited for news, was Lieutenant-General Dan Halutz, 58, a daring fighter pilot in the 1973 Arab-Israeli war who had become chief of staff a year earlier and now faced the biggest test of his career.
Over the Mediterranean, west of Beirut, the elite F-15I squadron made its final preparations to strike with precision guided weapons against Hezbollah’s Iranian-made long-range Zelzal rockets, aimed at Tel Aviv.
Just before midnight, the order “Fire!” — given by the squadron leader — could be heard in the Tel Aviv bunker.   Within moments the first Hezbollah missile and launcher were blown up.   Thirty-nine tense minutes later the squadron leader’s voice was heard again: “Fifty-four launchers have been destroyed.   Returning to base.”
Halutz smiled with relief and called Ehud Olmert, the prime minister, who was enjoying a cigar as he waited by a secure red phone at his residence in Jerusalem.
“All the long-range rockets have been destroyed,” Halutz announced proudly.   After a short pause, he added four words that have since haunted him: “We’ve won the war.”
Even as Halutz was declaring victory, 12 Israeli soldiers from the Maglan reconnaissance unit were already running into an ambush just over the border inside Lebanon near the village of Maroun a-Ras.
“We didn’t know what hit us,” said one of the soldiers, who asked to be named only as Gad.   “In seconds we had two dead.”
With several others wounded and retreating under heavy fire the Maglans, one of the finest units in the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF), were astonished by the firepower and perseverance of Hezbollah.
“Evidently they had never heard that an Arab soldier is supposed to run away after a short engagement with the Israelis,” said Gad.
“We expected a tent and three Kalashnikovs — that was the intelligence we were given.   Instead, we found a hydraulic steel door leading to a well-equipped network of tunnels.”
As daylight broke the Maglans found themselves under fire from all sides by Hezbollah forces who knew every inch of the terrain and exploited their knowledge to the full.  
The commander of the IDF’s northern sector, Lieutenant-General Udi Adam, could barely believe that some of his best soldiers had been so swiftly trapped; neither could the chief of staff.
“What’s wrong with the Maglans?”  Halutz demanded to know.   “They are surrounded,” Adam replied quietly.   “I must send in more forces.”
As the reinforcements of the Egoz brigade prepared to enter Maroun a-Ras and rescue their comrades, however, several were mown down in a second ambush.   Hours of battle ensued before the Maglan and Egoz platoons were able to drag their dead and wounded back to Israel.
Hezbollah also suffered heavy casualties but its fighters slipped back into their tunnels to await the next round of fighting.   It was immediately obvious to everyone in Tel Aviv that this was going to be a tougher fight than Halutz had bargained for.
As the war unfolded his optimism was brought crashing down to earth — and with it the invincible reputation of the Israeli armed forces.
In five weeks, their critics charge, they displayed tactical incompetence and strategic short-sightedness.   Their much-vaunted intelligence was found wanting.
Their political leadership was shown to vacillate.   Their commanders proved fractious.   In many cases the training of their men was poor and their equipment inadequate.   Despite many individual acts of bravery, some of the men of the IDF were pushed to the point of mutiny.
Last week, in an contrite letter to his soldiers, Halutz admitted to “mistakes which will all be corrected”.   It is far from clear whether Halutz will remain in position to correct them.
As calls mounted this weekend — not least from the families of many of the 117 fallen Israeli soldiers — for the resignation of those deemed responsible for the failures, Olmert was expected to set up an inquiry into the conduct of the war.   A poll showed that 63% of Israelis believed Olmert should quit, while 74% called for Amir Peretz, the defence minister, to go, and 54% wanted Halutz out.
“Olmert faces a serious risk of a no-confidence vote in the Knesset,” said Hanan Kristal, a leading political commentator.   “A State Commission will give him four to six months of critical breathing time.”
Meanwhile the Israeli public are struggling to accept that the country’s security might now depend on whether a French-led United Nations peacekeeping force proves able to disarm Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.   In addition to 7,000 troops already promised by EU states, the UN has received offers from several Muslim countries, some of which do not even recognise Israel.   The force is unlikely to reach full strength for at least two months.
Much attention is being paid, however, to the deployment of these forces and especially to Israel’s apparent over-reliance on air power under the command of the Halutz.  
Critics of Halutz, a former air force commander, believe he should have sent in overwhelming forces on the ground to drive Hezbollah back from border areas where they remained active right up to the end of the 34-day conflict.
“The air force can only assist ground forces; it can never win a war — any war,” said one veteran Israeli officer last week.
Another critical factor under consideration was that Hezbollah seemed so much better prepared.   They launched nearly 200 rockets a day at Israel.   They used advanced anti-tank missiles with lethal professionalism and stunned their opponents with their coolness under pressure and their willingness to “martyr” themselves in battle.
Apparently using techniques learnt from their paymasters in Iran, they were even able to crack the codes and follow the fast-changing frequencies of Israeli radio communications, intercepting reports of the casualties they had inflicted again and again.   This enabled them to dominate the media war by announcing Israeli fatalities first.
Instead the war against Lebanon is now being fought on the diplomatic front, with rumour and Israel's continued naval blockade among the weapons.
And if Israel, along with some in Lebanon, claimed that the 1,183 mostly civilians who perished in the bombardment were "collateral damage", the new front makes no such distinctions.
It is the whole of Lebanon that is now being squeezed.
While the continued naval blockade is not yet hampering the arrival of humanitarian aid, it is strangling the Lebanese economy.
"Humanitarian assistance is only a small input and it targets the most vulnerable.   But overall, if the naval blockade continues, then the whole of Lebanon becomes more and more vulnerable," says UN Humanitarian Coordinator David Shearer.
Israel, though, according to statements issued by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, has no plans to end that blockade despite repeated calls by the Lebanese government for it to do so.
Israeli breaches of United Nations' Security Council Resolution 1701, met by and large with silence on the part of the international community, appear designed to intimidate the Lebanese public by suggesting that Israel is willing and able to reignite hostilities.
"The situation could spin out of control very easily," said Khaled Mansour, the UN spokesman in Beirut, echoing statements made by UN special envoy Terje Roed-Larsen following Israel's raid in Baalbek earlier this week.
UN Secretary- General Kofi Annan condemned the raid as a breach of the resolution but, typical of the international community's chastisements of Israel in the past, the condemnation was verbal and there was no suggestion of any action being taken.
Israel's attempts to propagate the atmosphere of fear and uncertainty in Lebanon are, argue some observers, a strategy to underline who it is that really calls the shots when it comes to regional diplomacy.
"The statements issued by Larsen act as a form of psychological pressure," says Charles Harb, a social psychologist at the American University in Beirut.
Adding that at this point the potential for an actual re-escalation of the brutal war is next-to-nil.
Serene Assir from Beirut     http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/
Please take note of terminolgy and Western faulty reasoning.
The assumption is being that Israel and Western, US, UK analysis, both military and otherwise, is the de-facto reasoning of truth.
This would be much more truthful —
'...sent into Lebanon the invading 51st battalion Golani brigade.'
Kewe — TheWE.biz
The Sunday Times - World
August 27, 2006
Humbling of the supertroops shatters Israeli army morale
Uzi Mahnaimi, Tel Aviv
“They monitored our secure radio communications in the most professional way,” one Israeli officer admitted.   “When we lose a man, the fighting unit immediately gives the location and the number back to headquarters.   What Hezbollah did was to monitor our radio and immediately send it to their Al-Manar TV, which broadcast it almost live, long before the official Israeli radio.”
Hezbollah appears to have divided a three mile-wide strip along the Israeli-Lebanese border into numerous “killing boxes”.   Each box was protected in classic guerrilla fashion with booby-traps, land mines, and even CCTV cameras to watch every step of the advancing Israeli army.
“Our brass stupidly fell into the Hezbollah traps,” said Raphael, an infantry battalion reserve major.   “The generals wanted us to attack as many villages as possible for no obvious reason.   This was exactly what Hezbollah wanted us to do — they wanted to bog us down in as many small battles as possible and bleed us this way.”
The casualties from Russian-made anti-tank missiles have caused particular concern.   An Israeli-invented radar defence shield codenamed Flying Jacket and costing £200,000 was installed on only four tanks.   None of them was struck by anti-tank missiles.
But Hezbollah hit 46 tanks that lacked the shield.   “£200,000 per tank is not beyond Israel’s means,” noted one military source acidly.
While the regular army was reasonably well equipped, the reservists were not.   “We arrived at our depots only to find that our combat gear had been opened and equipment given to regular soldiers,” revealed Moshe, a fighter in the Alexandroni brigade.   “The equipment was, of course, never returned.”
The Alexandroni fought in the west, near the Mediterranean, and did well initially.   But logistics were appalling.   “We had no fresh water as it was too dangerous to ship it to us,” Moshe added.   “I’m ashamed to admit we had to drink water from the canteens of dead Hezbollah, and break into local shops for food.”
The Israeli leadership became determined to destroy the Hezbollah stronghold of Bint Jbeil because of its powerful symbolism to the enemy.
This was the place where Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, Hizbollah’s general secretary, had given his keynote speech after Israel withdrew in 2000, ending 18 years of occupation.   Nasrallah said in Bint Jbail that Israel would be destroyed.   Now Israeli leaders wanted to show him how badly mistaken he had been.
“Conquer Bint Jbail,” Halutz told Adam, the northern sector commander.   Adam is said to have replied: “Hold on, Halutz.   Do you know what that means?   Do you realise that the casbah [old quarter] of Bint Jbail alone contains more than 5,000 houses?   And you want me to send in one battalion?”
Adam nevertheless did as he was told and sent the 51st battalion of the Golani brigade to fight a heroic but hopeless, battle.
As the Israeli soldiers approached the town from the east they fell straight into yet another ambush.   Hand grenades killed battalion commanders.   Then a rescue operation was mounted, which took all night.
Hezbollah fighters were also hit but retreated and waited for Israeli reinforcements to arrive.   Brig Gen Gal Hirsch, the commander of the 91 Galilee division, announced:  “We control Bint-Jbail.”   The next day more Israeli soldiers died as they, too, were ensnared in Hezbollah’s trap.
The Israeli media began to attack the army.   “Idiotic military manoeuvres,” was how one commentator on TV1, the state-owned station, summed it up.
Tension now set in among the top brass.   Halutz dispatched his deputy, Maj Gen Moshe Kaplinsky, as his special representative to the north, placing him above Adam.
Adam threatened to resign if Kaplinski issued orders to his units.   Kaplinski nevertheless did so.   Adam did not resign but is expected to go public soon with his story of the war.
Relatively inexperienced reservists were called up.   Oded, 27, a reservist from Jerusalem in a combat infantry brigade, was among those summoned to active duty.   “In the past six years I’ve only had a week’s training,” he revealed.
“Soon after we arrived, we received an order to seize a nearby Shi’ite village.   We knew that we were not properly trained for the mission.   We told our commanders we could control the village with firepower and there was no need to take it and be killed for nothing.
In the face of the stink coming off the corpses, Sheikh Ahmed is the only one not to protect his face with a surgical mask.
Wearing lightly tinted spectacles and a white turban, this Hezbollah leader in southern Lebanon imperturbably observes the now habitual disorder reigning in front of the Tyre government hospital.
In the face of this spectacle of desolation, the man displays his serenity.
"The resistance is doing well," he declares.
"Israel's murderous action has contributed to bring the people and Hezbollah closer together.   Not only in Lebanon, but also in all the Arab and Muslim countries, every day more numerous in their demonstrations of support."
      Cécile Hennion      Le Monde      7 August 2006      
      Translation: www.truthout.org      
Please take note of terminolgy and Western faulty reasoning.
The assumption is being that Israel and Western, US, UK analysis, both military and otherwise, is the de-facto reasoning of truth.
This would be much more truthful —
'engaged in occupation missions in the West Bank checkpoints, hunting and sometimes killing stone-throwing Palestinian children.'

Kewe — TheWE.biz
The Sunday Times - World
August 27, 2006
Humbling of the supertroops shatters Israeli army morale
Uzi Mahnaimi, Tel Aviv
“Luckily we were able to convince our commander,” he concluded with a faint smile.
Oded blamed the Palestinian intifada for his unit’s insufficient training.   “For the last six years we were engaged in stupid policing missions in the West Bank,” he said.   “Checkpoints, hunting stone-throwing Palestinian children, that kind of stuff.   The result was that we were not ready to confront real fighters like Hezbollah.”
On the day the chaos in Bint Jbail reached its peak, Amir Peretz, the new and inexperienced defence minister, flew to the northern border to meet reservists about to go into action.
Aviv Wasserman, a reserve major with the 300 brigade who is about to study for a doctorate at the London School of Economics, asked Peretz not to throw them into “unnecessary adventures”.
Lieutenant Adam Kima, of the combat engineering battalion, was in even more rebellious mood after being asked to take his men and clear the road leading to Bint Jbeil from the west.   Studying the plan, Kima rejected the idea — 10 Israeli soldiers had already died there.   “We were foolishly told it was all right — there are no Hezbollah forces ahead of us,” said Corporal Nimrod Diskin, one of Kima’s soldiers.   “We didn’t have the equipment to clear this road.   We were not ready for the mission.”
When the brigade commander realised that Kima and his soldiers would not carry out their orders, he called the military police.   The men were sentenced to 14 days in jail, although they were released a few days later.   The soldiers, most of them fathers of small children, believe Kima saved their lives.
“I noticed behaviour I’d never heard of in the Israeli army,” Kima said last week on Israeli television.   “In my training I got used to the idea that the commander shouts ‘Advance!’ and is the first to face the enemy.   Here my battalion commander was in the back of the group and the brigade commander didn’t even cross the border into Lebanon.”
As the fighting dragged on, some veteran officers lost patience with what they saw as the inexperience of the chief of staff and defence minister.   “What are you doing in Lebanon, for God’s sake?’   the former defence minister, General Shaul Mofaz, asked Olmert.   “Why did you go into Bint Jbeil?   It was a trap set by Hezbollah.”
Mofaz proposed an old-fashioned IDF assault plan to launch a blitzkrieg against Hezbollah, reach the strategically important Litani river in 48 hours and then demolish Hezbollah in six days.   Olmert liked the idea but Peretz did not appreciate his predecessor’s intervention and rejected it.
Olmert appeared to lose confidence and began to issue conflicting orders.   “Our mission changed twice, three times, every day,” complained one soldier.
Many Israelis have been left furious that the legendary deterrent power of their army has been shattered.   Even though Hezbollah has lost a quarter of its fighters, its military base in Beirut and its bunkers in the south, Israelis feel less secure.
They hear President Bashar al-Assad of Syria warning that he may retake the Golan Heights by force and the Iranians threatening that if the Americans attack them, Tel Aviv will be hit by ballistic missiles in retaliation.
On the final day of the war, Halutz was sitting in his favourite seat at the air force bunker in Tel Aviv, waiting for the results of a massive airborne operation.   Then the news came through that a Sikorsky CH-53 helicopter had been shot down by a Hezbollah rocket.   He is said to have felt defeated, both personally and professionally.
Halutz and his political masters may now be living on borrowed time.   Israeli’s military elite, such as its fighter squadrons and commando units, may still be among the best in the world but the mediocrity of much of the army has been exposed for all in the Middle East to see.
Israelis can forget and forgive many things, but not the perceived defeat of an army that commanded worldwide respect but suddenly no longer strikes so much fear into its enemies.
Copyright 2006   Times Newspapers Ltd.
Please take note of conflict terminolgy above.
eg: This —
'Many Israelis have been left furious...'
Might be added this —
'left furious because they have spent millions, perhaps a billion worth of U.S. given to them dollars
and splattered over South Lebanon villages U.S. supplied cluster bombs mostly after a cease fire was agreed killing and injuring more men women and children that will extend for years to come
and more importantly have not been able to occupy any additional territory
which they sorely covert.'

Kewe — TheWE.biz
The mention of Tehran and Damascus's active patronage of the Shiite organization causes him to lift an eyebrow.
"What does this Western obsession over Iran and Syria's support for Hezbollah mean?
"Do their media also go to the trouble of specifying that Israel is supported by the United States and Europe?"
"My answer about Iran and Syria's role," Sheikh Ahmed adds, "is summarized by Condoleezza Rice's speech.
"She keeps calling for a 'Greater Middle East.'
"Well then, here it is!
"Confronted with the American-Zionist plan for the systematic destruction of Lebanon, the 'Greater Middle East' is reacting in chorus to defend its rights.
"Hezbollah's objective has never changed.
"Since its creation, its role has been to fight against Israeli occupation and aggression in Lebanon.
"We represent the resistance of all Lebanese.
"Syria and Iran take our country's fate to heart.
"That's normal."
"If, according to the Americans, that is terrorism, if all Arabs and Muslims are terrorists," he adds ironically, "well, then, we proudly declare ourselves to be a terrorist organization."
The Israeli offensive's death toll - over 1,000 deaths according to official figures - has spread hatred of Israelis among even those Lebanese least inclined to support the Shia Party of God.
From that perspective, no one doubts that Hezbollah could enjoy the benefit of relief battalions should that be necessary.
Aadel, a young man displaced from the south whom I met in Saida, explained that he is "a communist and an atheist to the nth degree."
"I already offered my help to Hezbollah," he assured me.
"They thanked me and said it wasn't necessary right now.
"Whenever they want me to, I'll fight
"Hezbollah is the only armed group never to have turned its weapons against other Lebanese communities.
"Today, it represents our strongest military asset against the enemy.
"It's logical to support them," he concludes.
On a road not far from Tyre, Hussein, a Hezbollah fighter, transports long metal cylinders in the back of his hatchback.
They will contain explosive charges that will be buried and later blow up IDF tanks via a simple remote-control pressure.
After he explains these details, he says it will be impossible to photograph the little arsenal.
"We don't mind journalists," Hussein explains, "but we don't trust pictures.
"Southern Lebanon is infiltrated with spies, and we've had several bad experiences in the past.
"Our strength consists in preserving military secrecy."
"Hezbollah doesn't warn anybody and doesn't report to anybody," confirms Hajj Rifaat, Fatah official in the Palestinian camp of Rachidiye, close to Tyre.
"Only Hamas, present in some Palestinian camps in the South, actively participates in operations.
"If the Palestinian fedayyeen had adopted the same tactic thirty years ago, maybe we wouldn't have lost so quickly.
"But what we understand today seems to have escaped the Israeli strategists.
"Look at the result!"
With respect to military defeats and victories, it's difficult to trust the contradictory declarations of each side.
From his base in Naqoura, in the extreme south of Lebanon, the liaison officer to the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), French colonel Jacques Colleville, is one of the best experts regarding the situation on the ground.
"Everyone has been surprised by Hezbollah's degree of preparation," he acknowledges, "as well as by the degree of Israel's lack of awareness."
"UNIFIL estimates that Hezbollah had 16,000 rockets at the outbreak of the war.
"Their weapons and munitions capacity has remained three quarters intact," deems Colonel Colleville.
"Their fortified underground networks are very effective.
"Pockets of resistance have resurfaced in the areas Israel thought it controlled....
"After several weeks of strikes as powerful and intense as those around the Bint Jbeil stronghold, we've seen Hezbollah fighters come out of their holes, as fresh as on the first days of fighting.
"There are no European style land battles here."
According to Colonel Colleville, "It's all about urban guerrilla warfare, which is not necessarily in favor of the attacker and against which bombardment is not very effective.
"The mobilization of Israeli Reserve soldiers doesn't change anything in the overall situation.
"On the ground, it is very difficult to imagine an end to the fighting."
Cécile Hennion      Le Monde      7 August 2006      
      Translation: www.truthout.org      

Bint Jbeil And Tyre Targets of Israeli Terror Campaign

This video shows the awful misery of those who are left with nothing.
In Bint Jbeil the unfortunate elderly and frail faced an agonising time as Israel bombs and flattened their town.
As www.turntoislam.com states: "Its awful how both Blair and Bush can let this continue....
TheWE.biz adds:
Blair and Bush not only let this continue, the US taxpayer is paying for the Israel military and supplying the bombs.
Blair and the Labour UK government has allowed passage of these bombs through the UK airfields.
It is not clear if they are still doing so."
[Note from TheWE.biz:
WWW.TURNTOISLAM.COM is a proselytising website
To download the videos you must register with the site if you enter.
We have included this video — from Google Video — and the one below — from YouTube — because we believe they are invaluable in understanding the present Lebanon horror
You access Google and YouTube only, when you view these videos from here.]

Lebanon "Fog of War"

Lebanese Doctors and Civillians Speak Out against the Terrorism they are facing from Israel.
Chemical Weapons, Cluster Bombs, Massacres Shocking Documentary About the War in Lebanon and the tradgedy in Qana.
Lebanese testimonials to the war.
Doctors Speak Out Against War Crimes.
Video taken from Sky News, placed on YouTube:

Galloway wipes the floor with Sky News anchor

Sky News anchor: Joining me now is a man who’s not known for sitting on the fence.   He passionately opposed the invasion of Iraq and now he feels that Hizbullah is justified in attacking Israel.   The Respect MP for Bethnel Green is in our London studio.   A very good evening, uh good morning to you Mr. Galloway.   How do you JUSTIFY your support for Hizbullah and its leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah?
She might as well have punched him in the face and handed him a gun.
US ISRAEL MASS WAR CRIMES
Israel Caused Holocaust Palestine Lebanon
Atrocities Lebanon and Palestine
 U.S. to Israel:                     
 — An apocalypse of Evil being created                     
 — 500 'bunker buster' bombs                     
       All with U.S. Money:       
       US and Israel War Crimes       
He was just shooting at children to amuse himself.
The celebration of Jerusalem day, the US missiles that rained onto children in Gaza,
and, a gathering of top articles over the past nine months
April 2004
US missiles — US money — and Palestine
March 2004
A young Palestinian man hitting an Israeli teargas bomb with his shoes away from demonstrators.
Israeli occupation soldiers killed two demonstrators and injured more than a hundred of them during anti-Wall demonstrations in the West Bank.
February 2004
A Palestinian elderly woman screaming in despair, complaining to God, as an Israeli occupation army bulldozer started to prepare her land for the construction of the separation wall in the village of Dair Qidees, near the West Bank city of Ramallah.
January 2004
Israeli occupation soldiers guarding bulldozers demolishing Palestinian homes.
A Palestinian man, perhaps who has lived in one of the homes, sits on the ground watching, his small daughters around him.
December 2003
Palestinian boys cry over the body of their father.
8 Palestinians were killed and 40 were injured,in the Rafah refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip.
Many homes were destroyed during a savage Israeli occupation raid on the refugee camp on Tuesday.
November 2003
A Palestinian family in Jenin, moments before the Israeli occupation forces blew up their home.
October 2003
Tom Hurndall, the peace activist who was shot by Israeli occupation forces while helping to shield some Palestinian children, is declared to be brain dead.
Two Palestinian children were among about 100 Palestinian civilians injured in the Israeli air raids on Gaza Strip, which also resulted in killing 10 civilians.
September 2003
See the home blow up.
Blowing up more Palestinian homes as a collective punishment is a daily Israeli practice (paid for by US money) to control Palestinians under occupation.
The life and death of Kamala Sawalha
A student leaves her house every night, leaving her two young children at home, spends the next several hours traveling by taxi and on foot to get to the university in the neighboring town — just 15 minutes away.
Kamala wanted very badly to study — otherwise, it would be hard to understand the sacrifice she made for it.
To get up before dawn every morning, to leave the babies with their grandmother, to spend hours on the road in the heat and cold, even when pregnant, in order to get to the campus on time; to risk being shot or subjected to endless humiliations around every turn, and then to travel the whole way back — in a taxi where possible and on foot where necessary....
“Suddenly we were facing the soldiers,” he recounts.  The jeep was parked on the left side of the road and its right door was open.  Kamala let out a long scream.  It was the last sound she would ever make.
At 11:30 A.M., they buried Kamala Sawalha in the town cemetery.
Children trying to commit suicide
Now the landscape itself has changed
More Palestinian mothers are giving birth at home because they dare not risk ride to hospital.
Punching an arab in the face.
The father went through it and now the son is going through it and no one talks about it around the dinner table.
Furer is certain that what happened to him is not at all unique. 
Here he was — a creative, sensitive graduate of the Thelma Yellin High School of the Arts, who became an animal at the checkpoint, a violent sadist who beat up Palestinians because they didn’t show him the proper courtesy, who shot out tires of cars because their owners were playing the radio too loud, who abused a retarded teenage boy lying handcuffed on the floor of the Jeep, just because he had to take his anger out somehow.
 
For archive purposes, this article is being stored on TheWE.biz website.
The purpose is to advance understandings of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues.