Free Energy
— Click here |
To download radio interview as mp3 click here 09/01/09 Bill and Kerry With George LoBuono |
To download a most excellent book click here AlienMindBook.org |
| Your Environment | "Sometimes you can see how there is erosion, and you can see how there is deforestation.
It's very widespread in some parts of the world.
We would like to see, from the astronauts' point of view, people take good care of the Earth and replace the resources that have been used."
Astronaut Commander Eileen Collins making her fourth flight on shuttle Discovery |
![]() |
|
|
"We Can't Say We Weren't Warned"
By Jean-Marcel Bouguereau Le Nouvel Observateur Wednesday 31 January 2007 [Images inserted by TheWE.biz]
What's happened?
Why this sudden keen interest in climatic phenomena?
I have to say that each of us has had an opportunity to become aware of the seriousness of the situation with the mood swings of a climate that's become erratic.
New bases for recent anguish
But the 500 delegates meeting in Paris under the aegis of the United Nations, the same ones whose first work had served as the foundation for the famous Kyoto Protocol, will - between now and Friday — give new bases for this recent anguish.
"Indefinite growth is impossible, we only have one Earth, but a civilization of happiness is possible.
Solutions exist, but public opinion ignores them, since the present power structures and those who wield economic and political power oppose those solutions."
That's what René Dumont, the first ecologist candidate for [French] president, said as early as 1974.
Preaching in the desert
While he was preaching in the desert then and only garnered a weak 1.3 percent of votes, thirty years later all the candidates are pushing one another to sign Nicolas Hulot's "ecological pact."
Suddenly, people are sounding the alarm everywhere.
Not without some hypocrisy.
Even George Bush mentions, thanks to new technologies, a "post-Kyoto strategy" — while he's refused to sign that protocol.
Davos!!!
And in Davos, the heads of companies have just salved their collective conscience by increasing the numbers of debates and roundtables on climate change.
But only 20 percent of them consider protection of the environment to be a priority.
Capitalism that can't allow itself
These company bosses know that the break with growth that the Rome Club advocated as far back as 1972 is a death sentence for a capitalism that can't allow itself a drastic reduction in production and material consumption.
It's a whole different economy that must be put into effect, based on other values.
And unless we confront that unknown, we are in the process of compromising the life of future generations.
The problem is that when they are questioned, the ardor of the French to act against global warming is as hypocritical as that of company bosses: 93 percent are ready to systematically sort their garbage or to decrease their electricity and water consumption, but that proportion falls to 61 percent when it comes to using the car less often.
We are running into a wall.
But no one can say we weren't warned.
|
Gore implores scientists to raise alarms
Ex-VP calls for research to be used for policy change [Many people believe that taxing people is not the answer to global warming I do not disagree with that Taxing the ordinary person means the rich and the those who control the corporations continue to control you Kewe] Jane Kay, Chronicle Environment Writer
Wednesday, December 10, 2003
Al Gore, who emerged from political defeat to attain celebrity status as a harbinger of the hazards of global warming, told thousands of scientists Thursday in San Francisco that they have a responsibility to translate their research into possible policy solutions.
Former Vice President Gore, presidential candidate turned climate crusader, spoke at the annual meeting of the world's largest scientific society, the American Geophysical Union.
He urged scientists to communicate the climate crisis “in ways that arouse appropriate alarm that can motivate changes in behavior.”
From his opening line (“I am Al Gore. I used to be the next president of the United States”) to his closing advice to speak out against censorship and manipulation of research, he used dry humor and impassioned pleas to encourage the scientists to play a new role in society.
“For civilization as a whole, we've somehow persuaded ourselves that we don't have to care about what happens to future generations,” he said to about 7,000 scientists, including 3,000 in an overflow room at the Marriott Hotel. “We have a duty to act on the basis of the best evidence.”
Even after 40 years of following the science of climate change, he said he was surprised to learn this week about new, earlier projections for when the Arctic sea ice will completely melt during the summertime. That research came from scientists at the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of Colorado.
“I was shocked that their horizon was 34 years under a business-as-usual scenario. If we allow it to go, it won't come back under any timetable relevant to the human species,” Gore said.
Gore said he understands scientists' "frustration of completing work and having it mischaracterized.
“Some information is misused,'' he said, and there are efforts to silence scientists.
He spoke of a news story Thursday about the Bush administration instructing U.S. Geological Survey scientists to submit scientific papers and other public documents for screening by supervisors. Other federal scientists, such as those at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, have also been censored.
Purging of data
He also criticized the closing of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency libraries and purging of data, contrary to congressional direction.
Gore called it an effort to politicize science.
He now runs Generation Investment Management and Current TV as well as serving as a consultant to Google and as a board member of Apple. His book, “An Inconvenient Truth,'' is a best-seller, and his documentary is being talked about as a possible Oscar nominee.
He appeared at the Commonwealth Club later Thursday afternoon with a panel including Sen. Barbara Boxer, who is chairwoman-elect of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee; Duke Energy CEO Paul Anderson; and Stanford University climate scientist Stephen Schneider. The experts, along with venture capitalists Vinod Khosla and Dan Reicher, discussed ways to curb carbon dioxide emissions with Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club.
The business people agreed that there are generally technological solutions for improving energy efficiency and replacing oil, coal and plastics.
“But no solution works in the marketplace unless it's cheaper than fossil fuel,” Khosla said.
At present, there is no real incentive for corporations to invest in ways to cut emissions because there has been no clear signal from Washington on what the future regulatory picture will be, Duke's Anderson said.
|
| |||||||
|
|
Global growth in carbon emissions is 'out of control'
The growth in global emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels over the past five years was four times greater than for the preceding 10 years, according to a study that exposes critical flaws in the attempts to avert damaging climate change.
By Steve Connor Science Editor Published: 11 November 2006 |
|
|
©2006 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd. All rights reserved |
|
Less than three decades |
|
|
In 2001, for example, IBAMA (the Brazilian Environmental Agency) issued authorisation documents for deforestation of 5,342 hectares, but the total deforestation showed by satellite images from INPE (the Brazilian Institute of Space Research) reveals that 523,700 hectares were deforested.
In other words, in 2001 just 1% of the total deforestation area was authorized.
Previous years' data is similar. |
Amazon destruction speeds up Deforestation underestimated by at least 60% Drought in the Amazon basin |
Unemployment can be eliminated if governments established youth corps where people can work to tackle the environmentPeople of all ages can clean up the mess the world has caused if governments would direct their energies towards this rather than police and military expenditure
|
|
|
No to the paper-millsWorld Bank underwrites the $1.1 billion Metsa-Botnia pulp millFinland corporation building polluting millEmissions into air: SO2 NOx TRs CO2 |
|
Corporations ahead of communities
Earth Day 2005: "Sleepwalking into an Apocalypse"
Bern Johnson executive director of the U.S. office of the Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide, works with attorneys in 60 countries to protect the environment through law.
He said today: "The damage that we are doing to our global climate is the greatest environmental challenge ever.
Governments are not stepping up to meet this challenge, so we are helping grassroots lawyers around the world find ways to take on climate change."
MECHE LU is an environmental research scientist with the group and recently returned from Chile and Peru, where she assisted local advocates working to protect wild rivers in the Patagonia region of Chile and protect public health near a U.S.-owned smelter in the Peruvian Andes.
She said today: "People all over the world want a voice in protecting their environment. To have a strong voice, communities need legal and scientific information. Decisions about the environment are too often made by governments that put the interests of corporations ahead of communities." |
Police protecting corporation and elite World Bank moneyWorld Bank underwrites the $1.1 billion Metsa-Botnia pulp millFinland corporation building polluting millEmissions into air: SO2 NOx TRs CO2
|
|
Go out Finnish pirates!World Bank underwrites the $1.1 billion Metsa-Botnia pulp millFinland corporation building polluting millEmissions into air: SO2 NOx TRs CO2
|
|
|
|
|
The thin ozone belt in the stratosphere protects human, animal and plant life from ultraviolet rays sent from sun
Most UVA, UVB, and UVC rays are converted by contact with the stratosphere ozone belt
Humans will not be able to step outside without huge special clothing screening all the body if the thin level of stratosphere ozone ceases to renew
All animal life will die if not kept indoors and never allowed outside
Most plant life will not be able to grow
All plants that provide food that humans and animals eat will not be able to grow
Stratosphere ozone renews from the Sun's rays, provided that the stratosphere warms sufficiently
Ozone holes are caused by the stratosphere remaining extremely cold
Increasingly long wave emissions reflecting from Earth are being stopped by global warming chemicals forming a barrier in the troposphere
One of these chemicals is carbon dioxide CO2
Stratosphere ozone is also destroyed by chemicals seeping outwards from Earth through the troposphere.
A major ozone destroying chemical is methyl bromide |
|
Published on Friday, September 21, 2007 by Inter Press Service
The Chemical That Must Not Be Named
Delegates from 191 nations are on the verge of an agreement under the Montreal Protocol for faster elimination of ozone-depleting chemicals, but the United States insists it must continue to use the banned pesticide methyl bromide.
by Stephen Leahy
‘It’s a black mark on this meeting. It is the chemical that must not be named,’ said David Doniger, climate policy director at the Natural Resources Defence Council, a U.S. environmental group.
'There is a powerful lobby group of strawberry and vegetable growers in Washington,’ Doniger told IPS.
Methyl bromide is a highly toxic fumigant pesticide which is injected into soil to sterilise it before planting crops.
It is also used as a post-harvest decontaminate of products and storage areas.
Although it is highly effective in eradicating pests such as nematodes, weeds, insects and rodents, it depletes the ozone layer and poses a danger to human health.
While alternatives exist for more than 93 percent of the applications of methyl bromide, some countries such as the U.S., Japan and Israel claimed that because of regulatory restrictions, availability, cost and local conditions, they had little choice but to continue its use as a pest control.
And so despite the ban, the Montreal Protocol allows ‘critical use exemptions’ for countries to continue to use banned substances for a short period of time until they can find a substitute.
In 2006, the United States received an exemption to use 8,000 tonnes of methyl bromide, compared to 5,000 tonnes for the rest of the developed world combined.
At the 19th Meeting of the Parties here in Montreal, the committee reporting on methyl bromide use reported ‘excellent progress’ in the continuing phase-out of the chemical and that not many applications for critical use exemptions had been received.
The notable exception continues to be the U.S., which has applied for 6,500 tonnes for 2008 and 5,000 tonnes for 2009, even as the rest of the developed world has dropped significantly to just 1,900 and 1,400 tonnes, respectively.
|
|
The delegate from Switzerland expressed concern that some countries were asking for large amounts and that 40 percent of the stocks were not being used for critical uses.
The United States maintains a large inventory of methyl bromide in excess of 8,000 tonnes, but the U.S. representative said these would be used up by 2009.
Emissions of methyl bromide have an immediate impact on the ozone layer, noted Janos Mate of Greenpeace International.
‘Scientists think it has three to 10 times the impact of other chemicals,’ Mate told IPS
The ozone layer will be at its ‘most delicate’ over next few decades before it begins to significantly recover.
Climate change is slowing this recovery, and the impacts are not fully understood, he said.
The ozone layer is the part of the atmosphere 25 kilometres up that acts as a shield protecting life on Earth from damaging ultraviolet rays, which can cause sunburns, skin cancer and cataracts.
The rays can also harm marine life.
In the past two years, ozone holes larger than Europe have opened over the Antarctic and Southern Ocean.
|
The World Metrological Organisation reported this week that the hole is back and bigger than ever.
And it could grow larger as spring returns to the southern hemisphere.
Climate change appears to playing a role in the formation of these holes.
Paradoxically, as the Earth warms at the surface, in the polar regions the upper atmosphere is getting colder, creating just the right conditions for chemicals like chlorine and bromine to destroy ozone.
Last year, researchers at the University of Colorado at Boulder discovered that winds circling high above the far northern hemisphere have a much greater impact on upper stratospheric ozone levels than previously thought.
Those winds appear to be increasing with climate change, translating into less ozone in the upper stratosphere.
Meantime, the U.S. growers lobby group is upset that the U.S. delegation isn’t pushing for higher volumes of methyl bromide, claiming that they could get far higher amounts under the Protocol’s rules because economically viable alternatives are not yet available.
‘It’s time to inject some common sense into this process,’ said Charles Hall of the Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association in a statement.
U.S. growers have never understood that methyl bromide is destroying the ozone layer, said Doniger.
Italy, Greece and Spain have nearly eliminated their use in agriculture, he added.
‘We’re all suffering with a thinner ozone layer just to benefit a few U.S. companies,’ said Mate.
© 2007 IPS - Inter Press Service |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
The ozone hole as seen over the Antarctic is caused by a lack of ozone in the stratosphere over the Antarctic area
The lack of ozone in the stratosphere over the Antarctic is caused by the temperature over the Antarctic becoming very low
Normal low Austral winter temperatures are intensified by heat waves being prevented from reaching the stratosphere from Earth by global warming chemicals in the troposphere.
This causes extreme low temperatures in the stratosphere over the Antarctic
The lack of ozone over the Antarctic is also due to the thin band of ozone in the stratosphere not replenishing sufficiently due to ozone destroying chemicals seeping from Earth.
The thin ozone belt in the stratosphere protects human, animal and plant life from ultraviolet rays sent from sun
Most UVA, UVB, and UVC rays are converted by contact with the stratosphere ozone belt
Humans will not be able to step outside without huge special clothing screening all the body if the thin level of stratosphere ozone ceases to renew
All animal life will die if not kept indoors and never allowed outside
Most plant life will not be able to grow
All plants that provide food that humans and animals eat will not be able to grow
|
|
Stratosphere ozone renews from the Sun's rays, provided that the stratosphere warms sufficiently
Ozone holes are caused by the stratosphere remaining extremely cold
Increasingly long wave emissions reflecting from Earth are being stopped by global warming chemicals forming a barrier in the troposphere
One of these chemicals is carbon dioxide CO2
Stratosphere ozone is also destroyed by chemicals seeping outwards from Earth through the troposphere.
A major ozone destroying chemical is methyl bromide |
UVC in the 10 to 290 nanometer band UVB, 290 to 320 nanometers UVA, 320 to 400 nanometers |
The Dark Side Initiates — Click here Dark path initiates depend on the denial The five-percent manipulator class is composed of those on the dark path |
![]() |
From the video 'Holes in Heaven' — Brooks Agnew, Earth Tornographer
In 1983 I did radio tornography with 30 watts looking for oil in the ground.
I found 26 oil wells over a nine state area.
100 hundred percent of the time was accurate, which is just 30 watts of power beaming straight into solid rock.
HAARP uses a billion watts beamed straight into the ionosphere for experiments.
Picture these strings on the piano as layers of the Earth, each one has its own frequency.
What we used to do is beam radio waves into the ground and it would vibrate any 'strings' that were present in the ground.
We might get a sound back like ___ and we would say, that's natural gas.
We might get a sound back like ____ and we'd say that's crude oil.
We were able to identify each frequency.
We accomplished this with just 30 watts of radio power.
If you do this with a billion watts the vibrations are so violent that the entire piano would shake.
In fact the whole house would shake.
In fact the vibrations could be so severe under ground they could even cause an earthquake.
Download or watch HAARP Holes in Heaven
— Complete version available for mp4 download Download or watch movie on HAARP — Advanced US Military research weapon on behaviour modification
weather change, ionesphere manipulation — click here Download or watch audio of Dr. Nick Begich talking on HAARP
— The 2006 update to 'Angels Don't Play This HAARP'. 'Angels Still Don't Play This HAARP: Advances In Tesla Technology'. Planet Earth Weapon by Rosalie Bertell
ozone, HAARP, chemtrails, space war — click here HAARP/Chemtrails/Alien aircraft/Illuminati involvement
1 hour FreemanTV.com video — click here (has 30 second lead in with blank screen and silence) Angels Dont Play This HAARP weather manipulation 1 hour 36 minutes video — click here (poor quality to watch but well worth listening)
Dr. Nick Begich, his book and his articles can be found here
http://www.earthpulse.com/
Article on Chemtrails — unusual cloud formations in the US.
|
|
|
www.democracynow.org Amy Goodman, George Monbiot
AMY GOODMAN: Is there more attention on the issue of global warming and extreme climate in Europe and Britain than there is here in the United States?
|
Free Energy
— Click here |
|
|
Africa rain forests cut and destroyed Earth's most beautiful work, the forests of Africa |
|
|
|
Monday, 13 December, 2004
Pollution: A life and death issue
One of the main themes of Planet Under Pressure is the way many of the Earth's environmental crises reinforce one another.
Pollution is an obvious example — we do not have the option of growing food, or finding enough water, on a squeaky-clean planet, but on one increasingly tarnished and trashed by the way we have used it so far.
Cutting waste and clearing up pollution costs money. Yet time and again it is the quest for wealth that generates much of the mess in the first place.
Living in a way that is less damaging to the Earth is not easy, but it is vital, because pollution is pervasive and often life-threatening.
Air: The World Health Organization (WHO) says 3 million people are killed worldwide by outdoor air pollution annually from vehicles and industrial emissions, and 1.6 million indoors through using solid fuel. Most are in poor countries.
Water: Diseases carried in water are responsible for 80% of illnesses and deaths in developing countries, killing a child every eight seconds. Each year 2.1 million people die from diarrhoeal diseases associated with poor water.
Soil: Contaminated land is a problem in industrialised countries, where former factories and power stations can leave waste like heavy metals in the soil. It can also occur in developing countries, sometimes used for dumping pesticides. Agriculture can pollute land with pesticides, nitrate-rich fertilisers and slurry from livestock. And when the contamination reaches rivers it damages life there, and can even create dead zones off the coast, as in the Gulf of Mexico.
Chronic problem
Chemicals are a frequent pollutant. When we think of chemical contamination it is often images of events like Bhopal that come to mind. |
![]() Cost of air pollution around the world |
|
But the problem is widespread. One study says 7-20% of cancers are attributable to poor air and pollution in homes and workplaces.The WHO, concerned about chemicals that persist and build up in the body, especially in the young, says we may "be conducting a large-scale experiment with children's health".
Some man-made chemicals, endocrine disruptors like phthalates and nonylphenol — a breakdown product of spermicides, cosmetics and detergents — are blamed for causing changes in the genitals of some animals.
Affected species include polar bears — so not even the Arctic is immune. And the chemicals climb the food chain, from fish to mammals — and to us.
About 70,000 chemicals are on the market, with around 1,500 new ones appearing annually. At least 30,000 are thought never to have been comprehensively tested for their possible risks to people.
Trade-off
But the snag is that modern society demands many of them, and some are essential for survival.
So while we invoke the precautionary principle, which always recommends erring on the side of caution, we have to recognise there will be trade-offs to be made.
|
The pesticide DDT does great damage to wildlife and can affect the human nervous system, but can also be effective against malaria. Where does the priority lie?
The industrialised world has not yet cleaned up the mess it created, but it is reaping the benefits of the pollution it has caused. It can hardly tell the developing countries that they have no right to follow suit.
Another complication in tackling pollution is that it does not respect political frontiers. There is a UN convention on transboundary air pollution, but that cannot cover every problem that can arise between neighbours, or between states which do not share a border.
Perhaps the best example is climate change — the countries of the world share one atmosphere, and what one does can affect everyone.
For one and all
One of the principles that is supposed to apply here is simple — the polluter pays.
|
Sometimes it is obvious who is to blame and who must pay the price. But it is not always straightforward to work out just who is the polluter, or whether the rest of us would be happy to pay the price of stopping the pollution.
One way of cleaning up after ourselves would be to throw less away, designing products to be recycled or even just to last longer.
Previous generations worked on the assumption that discarding our waste was a proper way to be rid of it, so we used to dump nuclear materials and other potential hazards at sea, confident they would be dispersed in the depths.
We now think that is too risky because, as one author wrote, "there's no such place as 'away' — and there's no such person as the 'other'".
Ask not for whom the bell tolls — it tolls for thee, and for me
|
A six-part series looking at the biggest problems facing the Earth
PART 5: CLIMATE CHANGE Life in Bangladesh's low-lying Ganges delta. PART 6: FIGHTING POLLUTION Durban poor take the pollution issue into their own hands COMPETITION Enter our contest — design an eco-friendly garden FEATURES Readers' pictures of the effects of pollution and climate change SECTIONS RELATED BBC LINKS: RELATED INTERNET LINKS: |
| Nobel Peace Prize Lecture Wangari Maathai — Tree Planter |
|
June 2010 304th consecutive month with combined land and surface temperature above 20th century average |
|
|
2004 4th hottest 2003 3rd hottest 2001-2002 tied for 2nd 2010 hottest first 6 months ever recorded CO2 band dispersal had to be stopped! Money! Money! Money! — glorious more money for those who control the world's purse strings! |
|
U.S. Government Mad Scientists Geo-Engineer Atmosphere
|
U.S. government scientists are bombarding the skies with the acid-rain causing pollutant sulphur dioxide in an attempt to fight global warming by “geo-engineering” the planet, despite the fact that injecting aerosols into the upper atmosphere carries with it a host of both known and unknown dangers.
The proposal to disperse sulphur dioxide in an attempt to reflect sunlight was again raised in a London Guardian article this week entitled, Geoengineering: The radical ideas to combat global warming, in which Ken Caldeira, a leading climate scientist based at the Carnegie Institution in Stanford, California, promotes the idea of injecting the atmosphere with aerosols.
“One approach is to insert “scatterers” into the stratosphere,” states the article.
“Caldeira cites an idea to deploy jumbo jets into the upper atmosphere and deposit clouds of tiny particles there, such as sulphur dioxide.
Dispersing around 1m tonnes of sulphur dioxide per year across 10m square kilometres of the atmosphere would be enough to reflect away sufficient amounts of sunlight.”
Experiments similar to Caldeira’s proposal are already being carried out by U.S. government -backed scientists, such as those at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory in Aiken, S.C, who this year conducted studies which involved shooting huge amounts of particulate matter, in this case “porous-walled glass microspheres,” into the stratosphere.
The project, which reached its conclusion this past April, is closely tied to an idea by Nobel Prize winner Paul Crutzen, who “proposed sending aircraft 747s to dump huge quantities of sulfur particles into the far-reaches of the stratosphere to cool down the atmosphere.”
Such programs merely scratch the surface of what is likely to be a gargantuan and overarching black-budget funded project to geo-engineer the planet, with little or no care for the unknown environmental consequences this could engender.
What is known about what happens when the environment is loaded with sulphur dioxide is bad enough, since the compound is the main component of acid rain, which according to the EPA:
“Causes acidification of lakes and streams and contributes to the damage of trees at high elevations (for example, red spruce trees above 2,000 feet) and many sensitive forest soils.
In addition, acid rain accelerates the decay of building materials and paints, including irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part of our nation’s cultural heritage.”
The health effects of bombarding the skies with sulphur dioxide alone are enough to raise serious questions about whether such programs should even be allowed to proceed.
The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur.
According to the LennTech website:
“Laboratory tests with test animals have indicated that sulfur can cause serious vascular damage in veins of the brains, the heart and the kidneys.
These tests have also indicated that certain forms of sulfur can cause foetal damage and congenital effects.
Mothers can even carry sulfur poisoning over to their children through mother milk.
Finally, sulfur can damage the internal enzyme systems of animals.”
|
Fred Singer, president of the Science Environmental Policy Project and a skeptic of man-made global warming theories, warns that the consequences of tinkering with the planet’s delicate eco-system could have far-reaching dangers.
“If you do this on a continuous basis, you would depress the ozone layer and cause all kinds of other problems that people would rather avoid,” said Singer.
Even Greenpeace’s chief UK scientist — a staunch advocate of the man-made global warming explanation — Doug Parr has slammed attempts to geo-engineer the planet as “outlandish” and “dangerous”.
Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, who recently proposed a bizarre plan to send spaceships into the upper atmosphere that would be used to block out the Sun, admits that geo-engineering could cause “conflicts between nations if geoengineering projects go wrong.”
Given all the immediate dangers associated with bombarding the atmosphere with sulphur dioxide, along with the unknown dangers of other geo-engineering projects, many people are concerned that “chemtrails” could be a secret component of the same agenda to alter the Earth’s eco-system.
Reports of chemtrails, jet plumes emitted from planes that hang in the air for hours and do not dissipate, often blanketing the sky in criss-cross patterns, have increased dramatically over the last 10 years.
Many have speculated that they are part of a government program to alter climate, inoculate humans against certain pathogens, or even to toxify humans as part of a population reduction agenda.
In conducting Google searches, one finds discussion, such as this example, of using sulphur dioxide as a jet fuel additive to be dispersed over the world during routine commercial flights.
“I suggest that both the sulphur dioxide and the silica particles could be delivered into the stratosphere by dissolving an additive in jet aviation fuel,” writes engineer John Gorman, who has conducted experiments to test the feasibility of such a scenario.
“We would want to burn fuel containing the additive specifically when the aircraft was cruising in the lower stratosphere,” he adds.
Earlier this year, KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver.
Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature.
The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.”
KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.”
The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality confirmed that the high levels of Barium were “very unusual,” but commented that “proving the source was a whole other matter” in its discussion with KSLA.
KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, about the effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan commented that “short term exposure can lead to anything from stomach to chest pains and that long term exposure causes blood pressure problems.”
The Poison Control Center further reported that long-term exposure, as with any harmful substance, would contribute to weakening the immune system, which many speculate is the purpose of such man-made chemical trails.
Indeed, barium oxide has cropped up repeatedly as a contaminant from suspected geoengineering experimentation.
KSLA also put aerosolized-chemical testing in its historical context, citing a voluminous number of unclassified tests exposed in 1977 Senate hearings.
The tests included experimenting with biochemical compounds on the public.
KSLA reports that “239 populated areas were contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969.”
One of the accepted truisms of scientific study is the fact that if scientists are proposing an idea, then those scientists with access to the bottomless pit of black-budget secret government funding are already doing it.
It is highly likely that chemtrails are merely one manifestation of “geo-engineering” that is taking place without proper debate, notification or any form of legality, and with a callous disregard for the potential dangers to both our health and our environment.
© 2008 Alex Jones | Infowars.com is an Alex Jones company. All rights reserved. |
Environment concerns
Cyclones, Hurricanes and weather global cooling |
Chemtrails and health
Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols
For more than a decade, first the United States and then Canada’s citizens have been subjected to a 24/7/365 day aerosol assault over our heads made of a toxic brew of poisonous heavy metals, chemicals, and other dangerous ingredients.
The US Department of Defense [DOD] and military have been systematically blanketing all our skies with what are known as Chemtrails (also known as Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering).
Rather, planes (fitted with special nozzles) release aerosols “lines” in the sky that do not evaporate.
Multiple planes are deployed, flying parallel (or often “checkerboard” patterns) overhead; and soon the sky is blanketed with many grayish-white lines [miles and miles long, although this is changing].
This clandestine program now includes aerosol-spraying planes in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand [all NATO countries]. |
October 1, 2009 ![]() |
|
Up to date ozone hole stats graph
Todays TOMS Global image
Satellite measurements of Arctic ozone show it is 15% to 30% lower than typically observed in the years following 1979 — when satellite records began.
|
![]() |
| Ozone Hole September 24 2006. From September 21-30, 2006 the average area of the ozone hole was the largest ever observed, at 10.6 million square miles. This image, from Sept. 24, the Antarctic ozone hole was equal to the record single-day largest area of 11.4 million square miles, reached on Sept. 9, 2000. Satellite instruments monitor the ozone layer, and we use their data to create the images that depict the amount of ozone. The blue and purple colors are where there is the least ozone, and the greens, yellows, and reds are where there is more ozone. Scientists from NOAA's Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colo., use balloon-borne instruments to measure ozone directly over the South Pole. By Oct. 9, the total column ozone had plunged to 93 DU from approximately 300 DU in mid-July. More importantly, nearly all of the ozone in the layer between eight and 13 miles above the Earth's surface had been destroyed. In this critical layer, the instrument measured a record low of only 1.2 DU., having rapidly plunged from an average non-hole reading of 125 DU in July and August. The numbers mean the ozone is virtually gone in this layer of the atmosphere said David Hofmann director of the Global Monitoring Division at the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory. |
|
While lowest values of ozone are still being recorded over East Antarctica, a greater depletion now extends to a wider area across the Southern Ocean.
As has previously been mentioned, global lowering of temperatures in the stratosphere correlates with increasing loss of ozone.
As mean global surface temperatures have increased, stratosphere temperatures have lowered.
Except for anomalies caused by the volcanic eruption of El Chichon in 1982, and Mt. Pinatubo in 1991, stratospheric temperatures continue to show a marked downward turn.
The complexity of all factors that destroy ozone is still a mixing of theories. Water vapor, reduced temperature, chemical and particulate reactions, all intermingle in these theories.
It is obvious volcanic eruptions warm the stratosphere, yet with this warming there is major ozone loss — due to increased particulates and chemicals reacting with ozone.
Despite the major effort to ban CFC’s, and other chemicals, there is at present only a slight decrease in chlorine (the destroyer of ozone). Various chemicals continue to seep up from the troposphere. Increasing polar stratospheric clouds, and a general lowering of stratospheric temperatures, is a trend that itself will create further ozone loss.
Another factor recently examined are bands of infrared waves. Scientists can now detected long waves that they have not previously been able to record, thousands of miles in length, which are naturally emitted from earth. These long waves create warmth if the radiation dissipates in the stratosphere.
Earth at night is cooled by long wave emissions flowing from the surface. These emissions have in the past moved out from the troposphere into the stratosphere. Now gasses in new temporary bands in the troposphere, (created by greenhouse gasses from Earth) are absorbing the long wave bands before they reach the stratosphere. These screens are increasing. Less long waves entering the stratosphere is one more factor in the lower temperatures of this region. Lower temperatures in the stratosphere means less ozone is produced.
With fewer infrared long waves entering the stratosphere, with an increased emission of methane entering the stratosphere — methane is transformed into water — with carbon dioxide and methane enhancing the transport of water vapor into the stratosphere, there is further concern in the complexity to the loss of ozone. |
British Antarctic Survey OzoneHalley, Rothera and Vernadsky/FaradayInformation about ozone at Halley, Rothera and Vernadsky/Faraday stations. |
| For updated inf click here: www.antarctica.ac.uk/met/jds/ozone/ |
Situation at 2009 September 30
The 2009 ozone hole has formed over the heart of the continent.
Ozone values north of the polar vortex are near 450 DU in places, whilst inside the vortex ozone values are still dropping as ozone depletion intensifies.
Lowest values are over the centre of the continent, with minimum values below 120 DU.
Ozone levels are below normal across the continent, with depletion exceeding 50% in the worst affected areas, and there are areas above normal in the circumpolar belt.
The temperature of the ozone layer over Antarctica is just past the annual minimum, and a large area is cold enough for polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) to form.
During the early winter, the polar vortex was often rather more elliptical than it was in 2008, and this lead to some early depletion in circumpolar regions as stratospheric clouds became exposed to sunlight.
It reverted to a more circular circulation as winter progressed and this led to another relatively slow start to the growth of the ozone hole (as measured by NASA/SBUV2), with the "hole" not beginning until mid August.
The vortex became more elliptical again in late August, with South Georgia being affected by the fringes of the ozone hole between September 2 and 6.
The hole grew to reach an area of around 24 million square kilometres by mid September 2009, but declined to 21 million square kilometres towards the end of the month of September 2009.
Forecasts suggest that the tip of South America has been affected by the fringes of the ozone hole from September 24 for several days and will be again from around October 4, 2009.
Situation at 2008 November 6 The 2008 ozone hole season is past its peak and ozone levels over Antarctica are rising. During the initial stages, the ozone hole was much smaller than has been usual for August, but it grew rapidly as stratospheric clouds were exposed to sunlight. It covered over 25 million square kilometres in mid September, about the same as last year and remained at around 24 million square kilometres until early October. |
|
It is now around 15 million square kilometres, which is larger than it was at this time in 2007.
The temperature of the ozone layer over Antarctica is rising from the winter minimum as the spring warming takes hold, but some areas are still cold enough for polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) to continue to exist.
PSCs were seen from Rothera on several occasions and also at Halley.
Ozone values are above 350 DU in parts of the circum-polar regions, which is a bit lower than at this time last year.
Lowest values, near 150 DU, are over Dronning Maud Land.
The temperature within the polar vortex is generally a little below the normal.
The vortex has begun to show a more elliptical circulation pattern, and the ozone hole extended over the tip of South America, the Falkland Islands and South Georgia between October 28th and 30th.
Situation at 2007 September 24 The winter polar vortex is in place, with higher ozone values, exceeding 500 DU in places, outside the vortex. In general the vortex is more disturbed this year than it was last year. The temperature of the ozone layer within the vortex is sufficiently cold that stratospheric clouds have formed and this has led to rapid chemical depletion of ozone. Inside the vortex, ozone values are below 220 DU, with the ozone hole covering much of the continent. Lowest ozone values are below 125 DU in central Antarctica. Early August saw the largest ozone hole recorded for this time of year, although at the same time very high ozone levels existed over the northern Antarctic Peninsula. The vortex was more circular in mid September but is returning to an elliptical shape and warming slightly. In mid September its area was 24 million square kilometres, but has since declined to 19 million square kilometres, rather smaller than the average for the last decade at this time of year. Some areas of Antarctica saw ozone values down to ozone hole levels (less than 220 DU) in mid June, suggesting the possibility of early chemical depletion, combined with some dynamic processes. The tip of South America and the Falkland Islands saw ozone levels below 250 DU on August 24, with South Georgia experiencing similar levels on September 4. The fringes of the ozone hole were over South Georgia on September 11. The hole is expected to extend across the tip of South America, the Falkland Islands and South Georgia over September 22 - 25 and strengthen again. |
|
Situation at 2006 October 13 Ozone levels across Antarctica dropped rapidly in September and are now near their minimum. Lowest levels are currently near 100 DU over parts of Antarctica. The polar vortex is shrinking, but remains significantly larger than average for this time of year. Temperatures within it are generally below the normal for the time of year. The ozone hole grew rapidly from mid August and reached nearly 28 million square kilometres in size at the equinox. It was the largest on record for the week preceding the equinox, although not an absolute record in size. It is now shrinking, although at 24 million square kilometres it is at a record size for mid October. The ozone hole has become much more elliptical and the edge of the ozone hole is making passes over the tip of South America and South Georgia. Antarctic Antarctic ozone hole movie 2006/2007 2006/2007 Ozone hole movie is produced from TOMS images. Halley — Total ozone: This figure [updated 2006 October 19] shows the variation in 2006 — 2007 and the normal for 1957-72. A few moon observations carried out on August 8 suggested that ozone values were not far from normal at around 300 DU. Mean values have dropped fairly steadily since then, reaching around 125 DU in early October (60% down on the normal for the time of year). This corresponds to a decline of roughly 1% per day since early August. The minimum value so far recorded is 115 DU on October 7. By mid October values were rising, and are now around 140 DU (55% down on the normal for the time of year). Rothera — Total ozone: Ozone values for the first two months of 2006 were around 270 DU, but slowly increased to around 300 DU at the winter solstice. |
|
Mean values fell after the solstice and reached a minimum of around 120 DU in early October.
There is oscillation with amplitude of around 40 DU and period about a month.
The minimum daily value reached so far is 105 DU. A significant rise in ozone amount began around October 10.
This figure [updated 2006 October 19] shows the variation during 2006.
Vernadsky — Total ozone: The early observations show significant ozone depletion.
No new data has been received from the station since mid August.
This figure [updated 2006 August 31]
shows the variation in 2006 — 2007 and the normal for 1957-72.
Temperature and PSCs: The 100 hPa pressure level is near the base of the ozone layer, but is reached by most radiosonde flights.
The temperature at this height becomes sufficiently cold that polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) can exist widely during the winter.
The temperature is below the PSC threshold over most of Antarctica.
PSCs have been reported from Rothera.
Halley — 100 hPa temperature: The temperature at the 100 hPa level is significantly below the normal, but beginning to warm, although it remains at winter levels.
This figure [updated 2006 October 19] shows
the variation at Halley in 2006 — 2007 and the normal for 1957-72.
Peninsula — 100 hPa temperature: The temperature at the 100 hPa level was below or close to the normal during August.
It generally declined during September and is now substantially below the normal for early October.
This figure [updated 2006 October 10] shows the variation in 2006 — 2007 and the normal for 1957-72.
Satellite: Satellite imagery gives a global
perspective on the ozone hole. Our 2006/2007 Antarctic ozone hole movie [updated 2006 October 6] is produced from OMI images.
The NCEP and KNMI analyses shown on the Canadian Met Service daily ozone maps pages give a good analysis in the Southern Hemisphere but the NCEP forecasts tend to increase ozone amounts within the ozone hole. US NWS CPC plots from NOAA show the current area of the ozone hole.
The ozone hole passed over the tip of South America and the Falkland Islands around October 4, October 7 to 10 and over South Georgia between September 18 to 24 and October 9 to 12.
The Sciamachy uv index from the ESA Tropospheric Emission Monitoring Internet Service shows the exposure risk at any location.
Arctic: Ozone values generally range between 250 and 350 DU (within about 15% of the normal) at the moment, with the UK experiencing values close to normal.
|
|
Ozone amounts are generally declining towards the autumn minimum.
Ozone values over the Arctic since June are shown in our Northern Hemisphere TOMS movie.
Temperatures declined sufficiently during the northern winter of 2005/6 for stratospheric clouds to form and for chemical and dynamic ozone depletion to take place.
"Ultra-cirrus" clouds, at heights above 20km were briefly visible after sunset on January 20 from the UK.
These are likely to have been diffuse stratospheric clouds that are thinner but more widespread than the nacreous
clouds.
For more UK information see the DEFRA UK Stratospheric Ozone Measurements page.
Reports of a substantial Arctic ozone hole forming in response to a solar proton event in the spring of 2004 are somewhat exaggerated.
Although this did lead to substantial depletion of up to 60% near the top of the ozone layer, less than 10% of the total ozone column is in this region.
The event therefore had less effect than normal day to day changes and no ozone hole was formed.
The spring of 2005 by contrast had much lower stratospheric temperatures and significant chemical ozone depletion did take place.
Although the column ozone never quite dropped to "ozone hole" levels, the amount of ozone affected by chemical depletion was broadly comparable to that seen in the Antarctic ozone hole.
Equator: Ozone levels are normally lowest over the topics and OMI data shows nothing unusual.
Situation at 2005 September 9 The atmospheric circulation over the Antarctic continent is in its winter state. Stratospheric temperatures are cold enough for stratospheric clouds to form and they have been observed at Rothera and Vernadsky. There is widespread ozone depletion over the continent, with ozone amounts over 50% down on the normal for the time of year in places. Lowest ozone amounts are approaching 100 DU, with most areas of the edge region below 200 DU. The lowest ozone areas are over the base of the Antarctic Peninsula and the Weddell Sea. Overall the area of the ozone hole is around 22 million square kilometres but is a little smaller in size than the 2003 hole, which was one of the largest on record during August. Ozone values at Rothera are amongst the lowest recorded at this time of year. Arctic: Ozone values over the Arctic during the course of a year are shown in our Northern Hemisphere TOMS movie for 2004/2005 (see also Northern Hemisphere TOMS movie for 2005/2006). Antarctic Antarctic ozone hole movie 2005/2006 2005/2006 Ozone hole movie is produced from TOMS images. |
|
Situation at 2004 September 21
The ozone hole (where ozone values are below 220 DU) grew rapidly from mid August to early September and covers around 20 million square kilometres, about average over the last decade.
It has only increased a little in area over the last fortnight.
The lowest ozone values are over the southern Antarctic Peninsula and off Enderby Land, and here values are over 40% below normal.
Ozone values are higher in a broad band between 60°S and 30°S, in places exceeding 400 DU.
The edge of the ozone hole passed over the southern tip of South America, the Falkland Islands and South Georgia from September 10 to 12.
It is expected to do so again from September 19 to 24, with larger ozone depletion possible from September 21 to 23, possibly affecting regions as far north as 40°S.
Arctic: Ozone values over the Arctic during the course of a year are shown in our Northern Hemisphere TOMS movie for 2003/2004 (see
also Northern Hemisphere TOMS movie for 2004/2005).
Antarctic Antarctic ozone hole movie 2004/2005 2004/2005 Ozone hole movie is produced from TOMS images.
Situation at September 2003 The ozone hole in September, usually showing the lowest levels of the year in September, has grown rapidly and peaked in size at around 28 million square kilometres (roughly twice the size of Antarctica) in mid September. It was larger than previously for the time of year in August and early September, but the maximum size only equalled the all time record. |
|
Very low ozone levels have been recorded over the Antarctic Peninsula.
The edge of the ozone hole touched the tip of South America on September 6 — 7.
Temperatures in the ozone layer are low enough that Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs), the key precursors to significant ozone depletion, have formed widely over the continent and ozone levels are dropping quickly.
The ozone hole is usually largest in early September and deepest in late September to early October.
Halley: The Sun has risen at Halley and some ozone observations are now possible, though these are of low accuracy due to the low solar elevation.
Some measurements made using weak moonlight in early August show ozone values around 220 DU (25% depletion).
Routine solar observations show values declining from late August and by mid September they had dropped to around 130
DU (55% depletion).
Rothera: Values at Rothera showed a slight increase from around 270 DU at the beginning of 2003 to around 300 DU in early June, with a long period variation (about a month) of around 30 DU.
The day to day variation was around around 15 DU.
In early June values began to fall, reaching around 250 DU by the end of July.
Values fell rapidly in August, reaching 135 DU by mid September, with day to day variation around 25 DU.
Ozone sonde flights from Rothera are now showing substantial depletion between 15 and 23 kilometres, with nearly 100% depletion at some altitudes.
|
|
Vernadsky: Early observations show ozone values declining from around 270 DU (10% depletion) in late July to around 170 DU (45% depletion) in early September, then recovering to around 200 DU in mid September.
The daily mean of 160 DU on August 25 is the second lowest recorded for the month.
Temperature and PSCs: The temperature of the ozone layer above Antarctica is at winter values, and PSCs are widespread.
Halley reported sighting of PSC on July 28.
There has been a radiosonde programme of three flights per week at Rothera since 2003 March.
One of the largest holes on record
Overall it is clear that this year we have one of the largest ozone holes on record.
Antarctic: Antarctic ozone hole movie 2003/2004 Ozone hole movie is produced from TOMS images.
The NCEP analyses shown on the Canadian Met Service daily ozone maps pages give a good analysis in the Southern Hemisphere but the forecasts tend to increase ozone amounts within the
ozone hole.
US NWS CPC plots from NOAA show the current area of the ozone hole.
Arctic: Ozone values over the Arctic during the course of a year are shown in our Northern Hemisphere TOMS movie for 2002/2003 (see
also Northern Hemisphere TOMS movie for 2003/2004).
Ozone values are slowly declining from the spring maximum, with values over the UK around the normal.
Stratospheric clouds were observed from Kjeller in Norway on December 20 (450Kb pdf),.
Stratospheric temperatures are currently well above the PSC threshold.
|
|
Equator: Ozone levels are normally lowest over the topics and TOMS data shows nothing unusual.
TOVS data has a calibration problem and shows values that are significantly lower than those that are
measured by other means.
Is the ozone hole recovering ? Recent reports in the media suggest that the ozone layer over Antarctica is now recovering.
This message is a little confused.
Recent measurements at surface monitoring stations show that the loading of ozone destroying chemicals at the surface has been dropping since about 1994 and is now about 6% down on that peak.
The stratosphere lags behind the surface by several years and the loading of ozone depleting chemicals in the ozone layer is at or near the peak.
Satellite measurements show that the rate of decline in ozone amount in the upper stratosphere is slowing, however the total ozone amount is still declining.
The small size of the 2002 ozone hole was nothing to do with any reduction in ozone depleting chemicals and it will be a decade or more before we can unambiguously say that the ozone hole is recovering.
This assumes that the decline in ozone depleting chemicals continues and that there are no other perturbations to the ozone layer.
If the decline in ozone stabilizes, and the ozone layer in the stratosphere becomes thicker, it will be the middle of this century or beyond before the ozone hole ceases to appear over Antarctica.
What we saw in 2002 is just one extreme in the natural range of variation in the polar stratosphere and is the equivalent of an extreme in 'stratospheric weather'.
See Ozone hole 2006 above
Global warming and the ozone hole. The ozone hole is a completely different phenomenon to global warming, however there are l between them.
The ozone hole is caused by ozone depleting chemicals in the atmosphere, which have been produced by industry, for example CFCs.
One link is that CFCs are also 'greenhouse gasses'.
Enhanced global warming is a probable consequence of increasing amounts of 'greenhouse gasses', such as carbon dioxide and methane, in the atmosphere.
Although the surface of the earth warms, higher up the atmosphere cools, thus increasing the area susceptible to ozone depletion and providing another link between the two issues.
|
|
|
UVC in the 10 to 290 nanometer band UVB, 290 to 320 nanometers UVA, 320 to 400 nanometers |
|
Global garden grows greener
NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center—EOS Project Science Office June 05, 2003 A NASA-Department of Energy jointly funded study concludes the Earth has been greening over the past 20 years. As climate changed, plants found it easier to grow. |
|
The globally comprehensive, multi-discipline study appears in this week’s Science magazine.
The article states climate changes have provided extra doses of water, heat and sunlight in areas where one or more of those ingredients may have been lacking.
Plants flourished in places where climatic conditions previously limited growth.
“Our study proposes climatic changes as the leading cause for the increases in plant growth over the last two decades, with lesser contribution from carbon dioxide fertilization and forest re-growth,” said Ramakrishna Nemani, the study’s lead author from the University of Montana, Missoula, Mont.
From 1980 to 2000, changes to the global environment have included two of the warmest decades in the instrumental record; three intense El Niño events in 1982-83, 1987-88 and 1997-98; changes in tropical cloudiness and monsoon dynamics; and a 9.3 percent increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), which in turn affects man-made influences on climate.
All these changes impact plant growth.
Earlier studies by Ranga Myneni, Boston University (BU), and Compton Tucker, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, Md., also co-authors of the study, reported increased growing seasons and woody biomass in northern high-latitude forests.
|
|
Another co-author, Charles Keeling, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, Calif., cautions no one knows whether these positive impacts are due to short-term climate cycles, or longer-term global climate changes.
Also, a 36 percent increase in global population, from 4.45 billion in 1980 to 6.08 billion in 2000, overshadows the increases in plant growth.
Nemani and colleagues constructed a global map of the Net Primary Production (NPP) of plants from climate and satellite data of vegetation greenness and solar radiation absorption.
NPP is the difference between the CO2 absorbed by plants during photosynthesis, and CO2 lost by plants during respiration.
NPP is the foundation for food, fiber and fuel derived from plants, without which life on Earth could not exist.
Humans appropriate approximately 50 percent of global NPP.
NPP globally increased on average by six percent from 1982 to 1999.
Ecosystems in tropical zones and in the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere accounted for 80 percent of the increase.
NPP increased significantly over 25 percent of the global vegetated area, but decreased over seven percent of the area; illustrating how plants respond differently depending on regional climatic conditions.
Climatic changes, over approximately the past 20 years, tended to be in the direction of easing climatic limits to plant growth.
In general, in areas where temperatures restricted plant growth, it became warmer; where sunlight was needed, clouds dissipated; and where it was too dry, it rained more.
|
|
In the Amazon, plant growth was limited by sun blocking cloud cover, but the skies have become less cloudy.
In India, where a billion people depend on rain, the monsoon was more dependable in the 1990s than in the 1980s.
The climate data for NPP calculations came from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Center for Environmental Prediction.
Researchers used two independently derived 18-plus-year satellite datasets from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometers on NOAA satellite.
The team processed and improved the data at GSFC and BU.
“Systematic observation of global vegetation is being continued by NASA’s Earth observing satellites. Earth observing satellites are paving the way to find out if these biospheric responses are going to hold for the future,” adds Steve Running, another co-author from the University of Montana.
NASA’s Earth Science Enterprise is committed to studying the primary causes of the Earth system variability, including both natural and human-induced causes.
Nobel Peace Prize Lecture Wangari Maathai — Tree Planter
For Toms, Arctic and Antarctic information, and how ozone is produced, click here: More on Ozone
CO2 record high levels in the atmosphere Increases in carbon dioxide never exceeding 30 ppm in 1,000 years — Now 30 ppm in last 17 years. Highest for 800,000 years — Climate fear as carbon levels soar
|
|
Part I — Garden Grows Greener
Global weather, environment and climate change Garden grows greener |
The Dark Side Initiates — Click here Dark path initiates depend on the denial The five-percent manipulator class is composed of those on the dark path |
|
Why did you cut the trees grandma
Typhoon Wipha Why did you cut the trees grandma |
Unemployment can be eliminated if governments established youth corps where people can work to tackle the environmentPeople of all ages can clean up the mess the world has caused if governments would direct their energies towards this rather than police and military expenditure
|
Free Energy
— Click here |
| TheWE.biz | See: State of the Garden | State of the Planet |